I saw my bloody valentine in a 3d cinema and was really impressed with the effect, so much better than what i saw in the past, i noticed in the manual that came with my samsung lcd tv that it supports 3d,
so my question is the dvd on sale in my local video store says 3d on the box but is it the same as the 3d i saw in the cinema a few months ago, and is it possible to to have the same effect on your telly at home
thanks3D MOVIE ON HOME TV IS IT THE SAME AS TRUE DIGITAL IN CINEMAS?
Most people don't have a 3d television and the shutter glasses that go with it that you have to plug in, shutter glasses require electricity to work. Plus you usally need a convertor box also. I had the old field sequencial 3d convertor box back several years ago that work with the old tube television. I worked really well but content for it was very limited and still is. So anyway since most people don't have the equitment to use shutter glasses it is probably just the blue and red or blue and yellow 3d format because all you need to use it is a color television.
Polarized 3d that they use in the cinemas can not be done with regular televisions or monitors, they are made to only send out one light wave. Polarized 3d must send out two different light waves, one for the left eye and one for the right. So they must resort to the red and blue format for television because that is the only format that will work on all televisions, unless your television is black and white.3D MOVIE ON HOME TV IS IT THE SAME AS TRUE DIGITAL IN CINEMAS?
No, the 3D for your TV requires a separate 3D decoder box. The movie can be encoded in 3D but it is not the same thing.
The 3D box will allow everything connected to the TV to appear 3D. You have to wear a special set of goggles and the viewing angles are significantly cut down. The goggles also cost about $200.00 a piece. I saw this technology demoed and wasn't impressed, I took my goggles off and got a massive headache.
Friday, February 5, 2010
Is It True That The New Film Avatar Is The First 3D Film Where You Don't Have To Wear Glasses?
3d movies at the theater have to be seen with glasses. There are some televisions being made that can show 3d movies without glasses, but that is the only instance that I know of. Just google wowvx for imformation on 3d televisions without glasses.Is It True That The New Film Avatar Is The First 3D Film Where You Don't Have To Wear Glasses?
No it's not true. I was lucky enough to see the 15 minute preview trailer at the cinema tonight and it looks amazing. You do need the 3D specs to see it properly though!Is It True That The New Film Avatar Is The First 3D Film Where You Don't Have To Wear Glasses?
No it isn't true and that is how you make any 3d film. You still have to wear the glasses. Also quit writing with every word first letter uppercase, it hurts my and other people's eyes
Dont know but that would be cool.
How is that possible?
No it's not true. I was lucky enough to see the 15 minute preview trailer at the cinema tonight and it looks amazing. You do need the 3D specs to see it properly though!Is It True That The New Film Avatar Is The First 3D Film Where You Don't Have To Wear Glasses?
No it isn't true and that is how you make any 3d film. You still have to wear the glasses. Also quit writing with every word first letter uppercase, it hurts my and other people's eyes
Dont know but that would be cool.
How is that possible?
Is it true the new zelda game will be in 3D?? (Wii)?
That would actually be amazin =D
The game isnt out til the end of the yearIs it true the new zelda game will be in 3D?? (Wii)?
that would be kind of annoying to have to put on 3D glasses each time you want to playIs it true the new zelda game will be in 3D?? (Wii)?
Not to mention give you headaches. Unless you have an Imax theater in your living room. Lucky...
Unlikely. 3D is mostly untouched territory for games, with VERY few TVs in the US even supporting the feature (We're talking stereoscopic 3d, not the red/blue crap). While it is the inevitable future, it's one that's still a bit far off from being mainstream.
Plus, the Wii's meager processing power means that it may not even be able to process a proper 3D image.
The game isnt out til the end of the yearIs it true the new zelda game will be in 3D?? (Wii)?
that would be kind of annoying to have to put on 3D glasses each time you want to playIs it true the new zelda game will be in 3D?? (Wii)?
Not to mention give you headaches. Unless you have an Imax theater in your living room. Lucky...
Unlikely. 3D is mostly untouched territory for games, with VERY few TVs in the US even supporting the feature (We're talking stereoscopic 3d, not the red/blue crap). While it is the inevitable future, it's one that's still a bit far off from being mainstream.
Plus, the Wii's meager processing power means that it may not even be able to process a proper 3D image.
If 2 vectors, v and w in 3D have the same length, then v-w and v+w will always be orthogonal...is this true?
If vectors are orthogonal then their dot product will be 0.
(v - w).(v + w) = v.v - w.w = |v|*2 - |w|^2 = 0 since w and v have the same magnitude (I used |v| as the magnitude of v and so on)
So yes what you say is true (unless of course v = w)Cats
(v - w).(v + w) = v.v - w.w = |v|*2 - |w|^2 = 0 since w and v have the same magnitude (I used |v| as the magnitude of v and so on)
So yes what you say is true (unless of course v = w)
Is that true that dog can only see 3D and not 2D i.e. picture or TV?
My dogs try to play with the doggy in the mirror..wouldn't that be the same as a picture on TV? They most definitely see themselves in the mirror..
My friend had a Boston terrier that had a favorite video..It was a animal dancing video, and the dog mimicked most of the actions..
this article tells what and why different breeds see differently..It shows that short nosed breeds see TV quite well, but long nosed breeds see things further away, and to the side better..%26gt; http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s鈥?/a>
So, other than all of them not seeing the color red well, they all see differently..Some can watch TV, and some can not see it as well..Is that true that dog can only see 3D and not 2D i.e. picture or TV?
LMAO!!!
NO,it's NOT true!!
What doofy ';granny'; have YOU been listening to??? STOP IT!! LOL!Is that true that dog can only see 3D and not 2D i.e. picture or TV?
I had a Scottie who would come running to the TV if she saw a cat. It didn't even have to be a real cat -- just a cartoonish one in an ad. And the volume didn't have to be on, either, so it wasn't the meowing that attracted her. I don't know if it's normal, but Holly certainly gave every indication of recognizing a two dimensional cat (which she loathed, BTW.)
Several of my dogs also were fascinated with their reflection in a large framed mirror. They used to run around behind it, looking for the ';puppy'; they could see but not smell. The look on their little faces was priceless when there was no dog back there.
i don't think it is true, my 8 yr old rottie has been watchin tv every since she was a puppy, she barks at every animal she sees on tv. it doesn't matter if it is a fish, snake, bird, cat or dog, if she sees it she will bark at it, and it is only animals she barks at
It seems to be. Dogs will sometimes react to barking on TV, but never watch it. The recognize smells but not pictures. In rare cases I have seen a dog react to its reflection in a mirror, but mostly only during puppyhood.
Like myself--I am sure that many other dog owners would like to think that their dogs watch tv with them, but it is true --they can not see whats on the tv. , however, my dogs act like they are watching the tube but its only because of the noises and shadows of lights.
no
at least i dont thik so
i,ve seen doggs react to some1 throwing a stik on tv
its pretty funny to watch them look 4 the stik afterwards
Dogs vision tends to be more sensitive to movement and flickering. Therefore rather than seeing the images on the TV screen and responding to them they are responding to the movement on the screen and the flickering of the images.
I didn't know that fact.
Well I dont know,,,,,,,,, seems like my dog spends a lot of time looking at a screen
see pic ;)
http://www.hunt101.com/img/343051.jpg
.
My friend had a Boston terrier that had a favorite video..It was a animal dancing video, and the dog mimicked most of the actions..
this article tells what and why different breeds see differently..It shows that short nosed breeds see TV quite well, but long nosed breeds see things further away, and to the side better..%26gt; http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s鈥?/a>
So, other than all of them not seeing the color red well, they all see differently..Some can watch TV, and some can not see it as well..Is that true that dog can only see 3D and not 2D i.e. picture or TV?
LMAO!!!
NO,it's NOT true!!
What doofy ';granny'; have YOU been listening to??? STOP IT!! LOL!Is that true that dog can only see 3D and not 2D i.e. picture or TV?
I had a Scottie who would come running to the TV if she saw a cat. It didn't even have to be a real cat -- just a cartoonish one in an ad. And the volume didn't have to be on, either, so it wasn't the meowing that attracted her. I don't know if it's normal, but Holly certainly gave every indication of recognizing a two dimensional cat (which she loathed, BTW.)
Several of my dogs also were fascinated with their reflection in a large framed mirror. They used to run around behind it, looking for the ';puppy'; they could see but not smell. The look on their little faces was priceless when there was no dog back there.
i don't think it is true, my 8 yr old rottie has been watchin tv every since she was a puppy, she barks at every animal she sees on tv. it doesn't matter if it is a fish, snake, bird, cat or dog, if she sees it she will bark at it, and it is only animals she barks at
It seems to be. Dogs will sometimes react to barking on TV, but never watch it. The recognize smells but not pictures. In rare cases I have seen a dog react to its reflection in a mirror, but mostly only during puppyhood.
Like myself--I am sure that many other dog owners would like to think that their dogs watch tv with them, but it is true --they can not see whats on the tv. , however, my dogs act like they are watching the tube but its only because of the noises and shadows of lights.
no
at least i dont thik so
i,ve seen doggs react to some1 throwing a stik on tv
its pretty funny to watch them look 4 the stik afterwards
Dogs vision tends to be more sensitive to movement and flickering. Therefore rather than seeing the images on the TV screen and responding to them they are responding to the movement on the screen and the flickering of the images.
I didn't know that fact.
Well I dont know,,,,,,,,, seems like my dog spends a lot of time looking at a screen
see pic ;)
http://www.hunt101.com/img/343051.jpg
.
Im going to a jb concert july 12/this saturday is it true theyll be filming 3d?
and if yes what should i put on my posterIm going to a jb concert july 12/this saturday is it true theyll be filming 3d?
Yes but on the 13th %26amp;%26amp; 14th
You should put
The Jonas Brothersssss are ah-mazingggg :D lol
or make a book of like 50 reasons you LOVEEE the JB %26amp;%26amp; try to see if you can give it to them!Im going to a jb concert july 12/this saturday is it true theyll be filming 3d?
im going to that one, but the ones where they are filming it for 3d is july13th and 14th at honda center in anaheim.
It will be filmed on July 13th and 14th at Anaheim, CA
NO.
Yes but on the 13th %26amp;%26amp; 14th
You should put
The Jonas Brothersssss are ah-mazingggg :D lol
or make a book of like 50 reasons you LOVEEE the JB %26amp;%26amp; try to see if you can give it to them!Im going to a jb concert july 12/this saturday is it true theyll be filming 3d?
im going to that one, but the ones where they are filming it for 3d is july13th and 14th at honda center in anaheim.
It will be filmed on July 13th and 14th at Anaheim, CA
NO.
In the two towers i am sure there is a part where you have to wear 3d glasses, is this true?
No.
I saw the film, and there was no portion where it split into red/blue colour splitting. Since that is the only way to project 3D without dual cinema projectors and polarizing filters and special glasses, the answer is clearly no.In the two towers i am sure there is a part where you have to wear 3d glasses, is this true?
I seen it in the pictures a few times and it was on the TV a couple nights back. There is NO point in the film where you require 3D glasses, what bit is it you think you need them for??In the two towers i am sure there is a part where you have to wear 3d glasses, is this true?
I've seen it a few times and been there i have never noticed
I saw the film, and there was no portion where it split into red/blue colour splitting. Since that is the only way to project 3D without dual cinema projectors and polarizing filters and special glasses, the answer is clearly no.In the two towers i am sure there is a part where you have to wear 3d glasses, is this true?
I seen it in the pictures a few times and it was on the TV a couple nights back. There is NO point in the film where you require 3D glasses, what bit is it you think you need them for??In the two towers i am sure there is a part where you have to wear 3d glasses, is this true?
I've seen it a few times and been there i have never noticed
I heard there was going to be star wars in 3D. Is that true?
Mr Lucas IS currently working on these. What is supposed to happen is one a year starting with Episode 1 I believe starting next year.I heard there was going to be star wars in 3D. Is that true?
Yes it is trueI heard there was going to be star wars in 3D. Is that true?
It wouldn't surprise me. How much more can he milk his franchise? Heaven forbid he try something different. Don't get me wrong, loved the original 3, but the prequels sucked. Maybe it's time to give Star Wars a rest.
Lucas has gone public saying that he'd like to remaster the original trilogy in 3-D. However, we won't see that for a few years because there aren't enough 3-D equipped screens in the U.S. yet.
Yes it is trueI heard there was going to be star wars in 3D. Is that true?
It wouldn't surprise me. How much more can he milk his franchise? Heaven forbid he try something different. Don't get me wrong, loved the original 3, but the prequels sucked. Maybe it's time to give Star Wars a rest.
Lucas has gone public saying that he'd like to remaster the original trilogy in 3-D. However, we won't see that for a few years because there aren't enough 3-D equipped screens in the U.S. yet.
HEROES IN 3D? IS IT TRUE?
will heroes really be in 3D tonight? and if so, where can i get myself a pair of 3D glasses to watch this amazing nonsense?
i love heroes!! [[[:HEROES IN 3D? IS IT TRUE?
I thought it was just Chuck in 3-D.
i love heroes!! [[[:HEROES IN 3D? IS IT TRUE?
I thought it was just Chuck in 3-D.
Help!! What must be true before MMX,SSE,and 3D Now technology can improve multimedia performance on a PC.?
This is strictly a guess. It's way above my head but I would say an improved set of instructions.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article鈥?/a>Cats
http://www.informit.com/articles/article鈥?/a>
3D graphing true or false question??????????? 10 POINTS?
TRUE or FALSE
(1,0,-1) is on the plane 2x-4y=6
and
(1,20,-1) is on the plane 2x-4y=6
please explain how to slove this, too
3D graphing true or false question??????????? 10 POINTS?
1)
false
2(1) - 4(0) = 6
2 = 6
not true so it is not on the plane
2)
false
2(1) - 4(20) = 6
-78 = 6
not true so it is not on the plane
(1,0,-1) is on the plane 2x-4y=6
and
(1,20,-1) is on the plane 2x-4y=6
please explain how to slove this, too
3D graphing true or false question??????????? 10 POINTS?
1)
false
2(1) - 4(0) = 6
2 = 6
not true so it is not on the plane
2)
false
2(1) - 4(20) = 6
-78 = 6
not true so it is not on the plane
3D Sculture True or Hox?
There is a website I read that said they will turn your face into a 3d sculpture or mask or even a pencil holder. It is called
thatsmyface(dot)com and I want to know if it is real. Has anyone just lost their money?3D Sculture True or Hox?
not quite sure as they don't give details how they do it. If you had to show up in person it would be fairly easy to do with 3D laser scanning, particularly as they like to omit hair. Not sure how they automatically convert one or two 2-D images into a 3D image. The only way I could see is brightness variations on the photo which would mean that the quality of the face would depend a lot of lighting conditions. As they want even light (flash) that's probably the case. But once you have the face as a good 3D model in the computer you can do all the stuff they advertise fairly easily.
thatsmyface(dot)com and I want to know if it is real. Has anyone just lost their money?3D Sculture True or Hox?
not quite sure as they don't give details how they do it. If you had to show up in person it would be fairly easy to do with 3D laser scanning, particularly as they like to omit hair. Not sure how they automatically convert one or two 2-D images into a 3D image. The only way I could see is brightness variations on the photo which would mean that the quality of the face would depend a lot of lighting conditions. As they want even light (flash) that's probably the case. But once you have the face as a good 3D model in the computer you can do all the stuff they advertise fairly easily.
Can you show how this is true. In a 3D rectangular box, one face has area a, the other b, the third c. So...
...the volume is the sq root of a*b*c. How come?Can you show how this is true. In a 3D rectangular box, one face has area a, the other b, the third c. So...
let x,y and z = lengths of sides of the box
area a = xy
area b = yz
area c = xz
volume = xyz = sqrt [(x^2)(y^2)(z^2)]
=sqrt(xy*yz*xz)
from above, volume = sqrt(a*b*c)Can you show how this is true. In a 3D rectangular box, one face has area a, the other b, the third c. So...
Volume is equal to the length*width*height or in your case a*b*c. It is not the square root of that calculation.
Think of it this way. The (suface) area is length*width. By multiplying the height, you determine the amount of space occupied by the object. As you can see in the equations, area is a two dimensional calculation and volume is three dimensional.
One side has width, one side has height and one had depth. All combined equals volume.
let x,y and z = lengths of sides of the box
area a = xy
area b = yz
area c = xz
volume = xyz = sqrt [(x^2)(y^2)(z^2)]
=sqrt(xy*yz*xz)
from above, volume = sqrt(a*b*c)Can you show how this is true. In a 3D rectangular box, one face has area a, the other b, the third c. So...
Volume is equal to the length*width*height or in your case a*b*c. It is not the square root of that calculation.
Think of it this way. The (suface) area is length*width. By multiplying the height, you determine the amount of space occupied by the object. As you can see in the equations, area is a two dimensional calculation and volume is three dimensional.
One side has width, one side has height and one had depth. All combined equals volume.
Is it true that team 3d is returning ?
i heard the news in this website http://rajah.com/base/node/16584 that team 3d are returning do you think they will be in raw smackdown or ecw i say ecw it needs more peopleIs it true that team 3d is returning ?
they stress week after week on TNA that they are happy where they are. so no WWE for themIs it true that team 3d is returning ?
I hope they dont actually, b/c the WWE sucks with tag-teams right now %26amp; they would probably end up breaking them up again. I think that's what he means by ';they're going in a different direction than where we want to be';. They are great in TNA, which is the top Tag Team promotion in the world.
Um, keep reading
';we're very happy here (in TNA), we're gonna continue to be happy here. I know a lot of people thought we were gonna go to WWE but right now, I don't think their product is where we need to be right now. They're going in a different direction than where we want to be.';';
First of all, Holy crap! I live in Buffalo! Im going to that house show tommorow! That is so cool! But they didnt say they were going back to WWE. They said they were happy there.
I just read it..And it said that they are NOT going back because they're happy where they are...
no i read that to and they said that they like the product of tna
they stress week after week on TNA that they are happy where they are. so no WWE for themIs it true that team 3d is returning ?
I hope they dont actually, b/c the WWE sucks with tag-teams right now %26amp; they would probably end up breaking them up again. I think that's what he means by ';they're going in a different direction than where we want to be';. They are great in TNA, which is the top Tag Team promotion in the world.
Um, keep reading
';we're very happy here (in TNA), we're gonna continue to be happy here. I know a lot of people thought we were gonna go to WWE but right now, I don't think their product is where we need to be right now. They're going in a different direction than where we want to be.';';
First of all, Holy crap! I live in Buffalo! Im going to that house show tommorow! That is so cool! But they didnt say they were going back to WWE. They said they were happy there.
I just read it..And it said that they are NOT going back because they're happy where they are...
no i read that to and they said that they like the product of tna
I know that Beowulf played in 3D at the movies and apprently you can buy it in 3D too, is that true?
no its not available until feb 23 and it wont be in 3D.I know that Beowulf played in 3D at the movies and apprently you can buy it in 3D too, is that true?
Yea you can buy it in 3D. i think ive seen it sell at walmart.
Yea you can buy it in 3D. i think ive seen it sell at walmart.
Im 33 weeks pregnant and my OB says its too late to get a good 3D US is this true?
Yes it is, the baby is too big to get any clear views. I had a 4/d when I was about 23 weeks and it was a perfect view. I'm sorry, its such an awesome expierence. Im 33 weeks pregnant and my OB says its too late to get a good 3D US is this true?
yes the baby is too big.
i had a regular one done at 33 weeks and they couldn't even see his face well he was already down and ready
don't worry you'll see your baby soon!Im 33 weeks pregnant and my OB says its too late to get a good 3D US is this true?
Not necessarily. I just had one last week at 38 weeks to check fluid and size, and she was clear as the light of day. I think it really depends on how he/she thinks the baby is positioned; they usually do one a little later on anyway, to measure fluid and such.
yes because the baby is getting too big and the baby will looked scruched up. 27-31 weeks is the best time
i really couldnt find a reason y u cant have an us at this point. im 38 weeks n had one last monday, u know the ones where u can actually see the babys face n everything. she looks just like her daddy (if he had chubby cheeks)Cats
yes the baby is too big.
i had a regular one done at 33 weeks and they couldn't even see his face well he was already down and ready
don't worry you'll see your baby soon!Im 33 weeks pregnant and my OB says its too late to get a good 3D US is this true?
Not necessarily. I just had one last week at 38 weeks to check fluid and size, and she was clear as the light of day. I think it really depends on how he/she thinks the baby is positioned; they usually do one a little later on anyway, to measure fluid and such.
yes because the baby is getting too big and the baby will looked scruched up. 27-31 weeks is the best time
i really couldnt find a reason y u cant have an us at this point. im 38 weeks n had one last monday, u know the ones where u can actually see the babys face n everything. she looks just like her daddy (if he had chubby cheeks)
Which one is true for human to say? It is a 3D thing or 4D?
Of curse you can say 3D. What about Magic? Some of Magic鈥檚 are come from an unknown Science. But there is some magic which is available by 4D abilities. Did we have this abilities or what?Which one is true for human to say? It is a 3D thing or 4D?
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. I don't know who first said it, but it is certainly true. There is a very interesting essay on it at http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=鈥?/a>
But I think you are committing a logical fallacy in associating magic with the 4th dimension. While there may be a lot you or I do not understand about it, the concept has been pretty well explored by mathematicians and physicists.
If there is a 4th spacial dimension which is usable there are a lot of neat things we could do with it - get into locked rooms, turn left hand gloves into right hand gloves, perform medical operations without cutting the skin... but the current thought is that this is not possible. The 4th dimension is often considered to be time in the space-time continuum, but a time dimension is not the same as a spacial one. String theory theorizes that there are 10 or 11 dimensions, so another 6 or 7 should exist beyond the 4 space-time ones we can observe. But it says these are curled up into something smaller than an atom (like our universe ';before'; the big bang), so it appears they cannot be used.
If I were to look for magic in an area of science only partially understood I would look at quantum physics. There is a lot of strange stuff on the borders of current science, such as quantum computers, which would be billions of times faster than what we have now, or the affinity between particle pairs that allows instantaneous communication between widely separated particles - whatever ';instantaneous'; really means in a relativistic universe.
Or astronomy, with dark matter or dark energy - when the large majority of matter and energy in the universe is in a state we can't detect there is the real potential for magical phenomena.Which one is true for human to say? It is a 3D thing or 4D?
We live in a 4 dimensional world. The three we perceive, length, height and depth, and the foruth is time. Hawkings described it beautifully in a Brief History of Time. Think of our existence as traveling down a line. Time is then like dropping a pebble into water, a concetric circle spreading out from that line. Our perceptible world is then a cone extending from the beginning of time to present.
No but isn't it 2D or 3D?
I would guess it is 3D. I have never heard of 4D.
Sorry but I cannot understand a thing about what you say!
No, a human is four dimensional :length, width, height and DURATION.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. I don't know who first said it, but it is certainly true. There is a very interesting essay on it at http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=鈥?/a>
But I think you are committing a logical fallacy in associating magic with the 4th dimension. While there may be a lot you or I do not understand about it, the concept has been pretty well explored by mathematicians and physicists.
If there is a 4th spacial dimension which is usable there are a lot of neat things we could do with it - get into locked rooms, turn left hand gloves into right hand gloves, perform medical operations without cutting the skin... but the current thought is that this is not possible. The 4th dimension is often considered to be time in the space-time continuum, but a time dimension is not the same as a spacial one. String theory theorizes that there are 10 or 11 dimensions, so another 6 or 7 should exist beyond the 4 space-time ones we can observe. But it says these are curled up into something smaller than an atom (like our universe ';before'; the big bang), so it appears they cannot be used.
If I were to look for magic in an area of science only partially understood I would look at quantum physics. There is a lot of strange stuff on the borders of current science, such as quantum computers, which would be billions of times faster than what we have now, or the affinity between particle pairs that allows instantaneous communication between widely separated particles - whatever ';instantaneous'; really means in a relativistic universe.
Or astronomy, with dark matter or dark energy - when the large majority of matter and energy in the universe is in a state we can't detect there is the real potential for magical phenomena.Which one is true for human to say? It is a 3D thing or 4D?
We live in a 4 dimensional world. The three we perceive, length, height and depth, and the foruth is time. Hawkings described it beautifully in a Brief History of Time. Think of our existence as traveling down a line. Time is then like dropping a pebble into water, a concetric circle spreading out from that line. Our perceptible world is then a cone extending from the beginning of time to present.
No but isn't it 2D or 3D?
I would guess it is 3D. I have never heard of 4D.
Sorry but I cannot understand a thing about what you say!
No, a human is four dimensional :length, width, height and DURATION.
The Answer to the True 3D Sonic games???
Sonic the Hedgehog 1, 2, and 3 were the best 2D Sonic games ever. What happened after Sonic turned 3D? Sonic Heroes, Shadow the Hedgehog, and Sonic the Hedgehog were horrible 3D games. Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 for the Dreamcast were amazing. The truth is, the REAL 3D Sonic games are hidden inside the Dreacast ones.
Emerald Coast in Sonic Adventure and Green Hill zone in Sonic Adventure 2 are perfect examples. It makes me very sad at the lost potential Sonic had. If all of Sonic's levels were as good as Emerald Coast and Green Hill, Sonic would have destroyed Mario and Crash Bandicoot. I only hope that one day, these innovating levels can inspire a real 3D Sonic game. Never-the-less, Sonic Adventure and Sonic Adventure 2 are outstanding games, the innovation was lost because of the new characters, and Tails/Eggman's and Rouge's/Knuckles levels. I hated those levels.
So the question is. Am I the only one that sees this?The Answer to the True 3D Sonic games???
I was a huge sonic fan back in the days of the trilogy, S%26amp;K, etc. I took a little break in the N64 era, and then when they released the 3-d sonic games I got extremely excited and bought a dreamcast JUST for Sonic adventure.
Horrendous.
Now almost a decade later nothing has changed. It just doesn't have that feel anymore. In the original sonic, sonic ran. He rolled. His feet moved really really fast. It was simple. The story was simple. There were minimal characters. Eggman was called Robotnik. Physics engine worked. The levels worked. It was fun.
Now, basically all sonic is is some superficial CG showroom bullcrap, not a videogame. You have a load of useless characters that do nothing but appeal to blind fanboys and anime fanatics (I don't think Sonic belonged in anime anyways). His new look is terrible, he runs as if he's ice skating, when he jumps it feels like he floats, and when you do actually run fast, there's no actual control involved. In all of the 3-d Sonic games I've played, most of the time I was pressing forward. Sometimes I wasn't even holding the controller! In the original Sonic games, rolling and ';ball mechanics'; were a significant part of the game's speed and physics (why else is he a hedgehog if he can't curl up in a ball). Games now have absolutely NO rolling involved whatsoever, and if there is rolling, it has no contribution in the gameplay. Introduction of dubbing and voice was terrible. They should have kept them silent like Zelda or with minimal voice acting like Mario.
The recent Xbox 360 game is terrible because, number one, it has bad mechanics. Everything is done for you, running is slow, bad camera, loads of glitches, collisions, and you bump into everything when you run. Bad level designs, worthless character designs. No challenge. BAD dubbing. BAD flow (load times are a pain in the ***). It feels like a game made out of desperation. Worst of all, there's an introduction of a human romance with Sonic. That's just plain weird and nasty.
Trust me, I used to be ten times more angry for Sonic team and Yuji Naka for ruining Sonic and even more angry that everyone didn't care and even LIKED the games, only blinded by their fanboy mentality. Nowadays, I don't really care as much anymore because I've accepted the fact that Sonic died way back in 1994. And I'm glad that people are starting to realize that the new Sonic games suck, as shown in the overwhelmingly negative reviews.The Answer to the True 3D Sonic games???
Yea those levels go in the right direction, but only because they are old levels
You are the only one losing sleep over this. I work in this industry and see tens of thousands of these 3D games packaged each week. Typically 30,000 of at least one of these titles you mentioned at least once a week, seems moslty for PS2 or GameCube.
nope i see it too...the thing is, sega have always published sonic games, but they have not always developed them, for instance Backbone Entertainment developed Sonic Rivals for the PSP. This gave the game a less ';sega sonic'; feel to it. It's all downhill from here, unless sega starts developing these once great games. I hope this helps.
you're right, a lot of the great sonic experience was lost when he was ported to 3D. Also, he had to use his partners in sonic heroes which could get a bit annoying since omega is a lumbering idiot and flying was so slow.
But now sonic and the secret rings is out and its all about sonic: Just sonic. It looks like the sequel to the last great sonic game made (sonic the hedgehog 4). check it out at ign.com
Alexande Best wishes for you...
http://208.109.69.157/funstuff/freeecard/greeting01.asp?Name=Alexande
Emerald Coast in Sonic Adventure and Green Hill zone in Sonic Adventure 2 are perfect examples. It makes me very sad at the lost potential Sonic had. If all of Sonic's levels were as good as Emerald Coast and Green Hill, Sonic would have destroyed Mario and Crash Bandicoot. I only hope that one day, these innovating levels can inspire a real 3D Sonic game. Never-the-less, Sonic Adventure and Sonic Adventure 2 are outstanding games, the innovation was lost because of the new characters, and Tails/Eggman's and Rouge's/Knuckles levels. I hated those levels.
So the question is. Am I the only one that sees this?The Answer to the True 3D Sonic games???
I was a huge sonic fan back in the days of the trilogy, S%26amp;K, etc. I took a little break in the N64 era, and then when they released the 3-d sonic games I got extremely excited and bought a dreamcast JUST for Sonic adventure.
Horrendous.
Now almost a decade later nothing has changed. It just doesn't have that feel anymore. In the original sonic, sonic ran. He rolled. His feet moved really really fast. It was simple. The story was simple. There were minimal characters. Eggman was called Robotnik. Physics engine worked. The levels worked. It was fun.
Now, basically all sonic is is some superficial CG showroom bullcrap, not a videogame. You have a load of useless characters that do nothing but appeal to blind fanboys and anime fanatics (I don't think Sonic belonged in anime anyways). His new look is terrible, he runs as if he's ice skating, when he jumps it feels like he floats, and when you do actually run fast, there's no actual control involved. In all of the 3-d Sonic games I've played, most of the time I was pressing forward. Sometimes I wasn't even holding the controller! In the original Sonic games, rolling and ';ball mechanics'; were a significant part of the game's speed and physics (why else is he a hedgehog if he can't curl up in a ball). Games now have absolutely NO rolling involved whatsoever, and if there is rolling, it has no contribution in the gameplay. Introduction of dubbing and voice was terrible. They should have kept them silent like Zelda or with minimal voice acting like Mario.
The recent Xbox 360 game is terrible because, number one, it has bad mechanics. Everything is done for you, running is slow, bad camera, loads of glitches, collisions, and you bump into everything when you run. Bad level designs, worthless character designs. No challenge. BAD dubbing. BAD flow (load times are a pain in the ***). It feels like a game made out of desperation. Worst of all, there's an introduction of a human romance with Sonic. That's just plain weird and nasty.
Trust me, I used to be ten times more angry for Sonic team and Yuji Naka for ruining Sonic and even more angry that everyone didn't care and even LIKED the games, only blinded by their fanboy mentality. Nowadays, I don't really care as much anymore because I've accepted the fact that Sonic died way back in 1994. And I'm glad that people are starting to realize that the new Sonic games suck, as shown in the overwhelmingly negative reviews.The Answer to the True 3D Sonic games???
Yea those levels go in the right direction, but only because they are old levels
Report Abuse
You are the only one losing sleep over this. I work in this industry and see tens of thousands of these 3D games packaged each week. Typically 30,000 of at least one of these titles you mentioned at least once a week, seems moslty for PS2 or GameCube.
nope i see it too...the thing is, sega have always published sonic games, but they have not always developed them, for instance Backbone Entertainment developed Sonic Rivals for the PSP. This gave the game a less ';sega sonic'; feel to it. It's all downhill from here, unless sega starts developing these once great games. I hope this helps.
you're right, a lot of the great sonic experience was lost when he was ported to 3D. Also, he had to use his partners in sonic heroes which could get a bit annoying since omega is a lumbering idiot and flying was so slow.
But now sonic and the secret rings is out and its all about sonic: Just sonic. It looks like the sequel to the last great sonic game made (sonic the hedgehog 4). check it out at ign.com
Alexande Best wishes for you...
http://208.109.69.157/funstuff/freeecard/greeting01.asp?Name=Alexande
What does the true 3d means?
At the movies for trailers for up coming 3d movies they will say ';in true 3d'; for some of them. I really doesn't mean anything because any movie in 3d at the theater is going to be polarized 3d and therefore not much difference between them. It's just a way to advertise for the movie. Instead of just say ';in 3d'; they are making sound better by saying ';in TRUE 3d';.
Really all the 3d movies at the theater are in 3d. You have different 3d companies doing the 3d for different movie studios, disney has its own 3d department and does the 3d itself, but the 3d for all the 3d companies look basically the same.
Really all the 3d movies at the theater are in 3d. You have different 3d companies doing the 3d for different movie studios, disney has its own 3d department and does the 3d itself, but the 3d for all the 3d companies look basically the same.
Is it true that the NEWTONS 2ND LAW OF MOTIONS can be used to compute 3d/swertres?
Some speculators say that!Is it true that the NEWTONS 2ND LAW OF MOTIONS can be used to compute 3d/swertres?
no they are cheating you
no they are cheating you
A problem with 3d hardware card iin true crime streets of la?
i have bought true crime streets of la i have installed the game when i start to play it is saying 3d hard ware card is not found in your system can i download it internet? or should i buy that one in hyderabad how much does it cost? any body please help me?A problem with 3d hardware card iin true crime streets of la?
Got the drivers loaded? Try a game patch http://www.gameburnworld.com/gp/gamefixe鈥?/a>
Got the drivers loaded? Try a game patch http://www.gameburnworld.com/gp/gamefixe鈥?/a>
Is it true that dogs cannot see 3D. If so how can I make my stairs look like stairs to my dog?
How can I paint or cover the stairs so they look 3 dimensionalIs it true that dogs cannot see 3D. If so how can I make my stairs look like stairs to my dog?
It is the animals that have their eyes on the side of their heads that have limited depth perception. They are usually prey animals who need to see as much of the animals around them to avoid predators.Is it true that dogs cannot see 3D. If so how can I make my stairs look like stairs to my dog?
Dogs have great binocular (3D) vision. How do you think they catch all those frisbees?
Wow they can see 2D, I always knew my dog was watching T.V. with me. She totally does.
Of course they can see 3D..!! How else would they walk around stuff....??! I think it's actually 2D they're supposed to not be able to see i.e. the television, their reflection in the mirror etc. But they actually can see 2D, it's just that it means absolutely nothing to them ( they can't smell they're reflection..) so they completely ignore it.
That's not even true but some dogs take time to learn how to climb and go down from stairs
For real?!?! Are you really asking this question? Come on.Cats
It is the animals that have their eyes on the side of their heads that have limited depth perception. They are usually prey animals who need to see as much of the animals around them to avoid predators.Is it true that dogs cannot see 3D. If so how can I make my stairs look like stairs to my dog?
Dogs have great binocular (3D) vision. How do you think they catch all those frisbees?
Wow they can see 2D, I always knew my dog was watching T.V. with me. She totally does.
Of course they can see 3D..!! How else would they walk around stuff....??! I think it's actually 2D they're supposed to not be able to see i.e. the television, their reflection in the mirror etc. But they actually can see 2D, it's just that it means absolutely nothing to them ( they can't smell they're reflection..) so they completely ignore it.
That's not even true but some dogs take time to learn how to climb and go down from stairs
For real?!?! Are you really asking this question? Come on.
Is it true there's supposed to be a 3D commercial during the Superbowl?
I've been hearing rumors that there's going to be a 3D commercial aired. It is true?Is it true there's supposed to be a 3D commercial during the Superbowl?
Yes it is true see the following link for details.Is it true there's supposed to be a 3D commercial during the Superbowl?
Check out this link to see all the superbowl commercials!! http://badassmonkeys.com/2009-superbowl-commercials/
Yes. They are giving away 3-D glasses at Wal-Mart. It airs at the end of the 2nd quarter.
yeah u can get them at walmart and their free their r 4 on one sheet
Yes it is true see the following link for details.Is it true there's supposed to be a 3D commercial during the Superbowl?
Check out this link to see all the superbowl commercials!! http://badassmonkeys.com/2009-superbowl-commercials/
Yes. They are giving away 3-D glasses at Wal-Mart. It airs at the end of the 2nd quarter.
yeah u can get them at walmart and their free their r 4 on one sheet
Why didn't they use true 3D for the characters and karts in Mario Kart 64?
cuz it would cost more money, and then they wouldn't make as much.Why didn't they use true 3D for the characters and karts in Mario Kart 64?
i have that game its awsome and beacuse its a old game and it dosent need to look real it would be boreing
i have that game its awsome and beacuse its a old game and it dosent need to look real it would be boreing
Which type of class will help me more to make my making a 3d mmorpg come true ?
Should I take the Modeling and simulation class or the
Software and game development class?
Don't answer this question if you don't know please.Which type of class will help me more to make my making a 3d mmorpg come true ?
You.. need to learn A strong stable language like C++, Learn about client-server relations, and I suppose 3D modelling and rendering.
There's a small MMORPG engine that lets you make 2D MMOS with no programming required; although you can learn VB and script it as well: http://www.dualsolace.com
Software and game development class?
Don't answer this question if you don't know please.Which type of class will help me more to make my making a 3d mmorpg come true ?
You.. need to learn A strong stable language like C++, Learn about client-server relations, and I suppose 3D modelling and rendering.
There's a small MMORPG engine that lets you make 2D MMOS with no programming required; although you can learn VB and script it as well: http://www.dualsolace.com
How do I use true grit for 3D studio max?
this is a question for the 3d studio max plugin ';True Grit'; created by Andrew Reid.How do I use true grit for 3D studio max?
3D studio max:
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ind…
true grit
http://www.bytegeistsoftware.com/prod01.…
guide:
http://sparks.discreet.com/news/index.cf…
http://sparks.discreet.com/downloads/dow…
http://www.3dmax-tutorials.com/search.ph…
http://maxunderground.com/archives/00099…
http://maxunderground.com/archives/2001_…
3D studio max:
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ind…
true grit
http://www.bytegeistsoftware.com/prod01.…
guide:
http://sparks.discreet.com/news/index.cf…
http://sparks.discreet.com/downloads/dow…
http://www.3dmax-tutorials.com/search.ph…
http://maxunderground.com/archives/00099…
http://maxunderground.com/archives/2001_…
I heard that commercials during the superbowl are going to be 3D is that true?
And i also heard that Chuck on monday night is going to be in 3d?I heard that commercials during the superbowl are going to be 3D is that true?
it's late in the 2nd half, or during the half time
get the glasses at your local grocery store
they give them away, if there are any leftI heard that commercials during the superbowl are going to be 3D is that true?
Yea, I got mine at Kroger Grocery today,the store will normally have a display in the beverage aisle with a bunch of the glasses in a big box.They should have plenty.
it's late in the 2nd half, or during the half time
get the glasses at your local grocery store
they give them away, if there are any leftI heard that commercials during the superbowl are going to be 3D is that true?
Yea, I got mine at Kroger Grocery today,the store will normally have a display in the beverage aisle with a bunch of the glasses in a big box.They should have plenty.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)